Archive for the 'Research International' Category

Nov 14 2007

Profile Image of

Imam in Nederland - Welmoet Boender

boender-imaminnederland.jpgDe vraag naar de rol die de imam speelt in moskeeën in de Nederlandse seculiere, niet-islamitische samenleving wordt al zo’n dertig jaar gesteld. De kernvragen in dit beschrijvend-exploratieve onderzoek zijn dan ook: Welke rol speelt de imam in de moskeegemeenschap volgens circulerende opvattingen uit het Nederlandse publieke debat over imams? Hoe zien imams en praktiserende gelovigen de rol van de imam in de moskeegemeenschap? Welke zijn de voornaamste overeenkomsten en verschillen in deze rolopvattingen?

De eerste vraag wordt onderzocht door het externe perspectief van het publieke debat over imams tussen 1993 en 2004 te beschrijven. Spraakmakende debatten rond publieke uitspraken zoals van imam El-Moumni en imam Haselhoef worden geanalyseerd

De tweede vraag wordt empirisch beschreven vanuit het interne perspectief van de imam en praktiserende gelovigen in twee moskeegemeenschappen en een islamitische studentenvereniging. Hoe is het om imam te zijn in Nederland? Wat zeggen zij in hun preken en lessen? In de studie zijn onder meer elf Turkse preken vertaald in de appendix opgenomen. Welke interactie en communicatie is er tussen hoogopgeleide jonge mannen en vrouwen die in Nederland zijn opgegroeid en de imam? Wanneer en met welke vragen gaan zij bij de imam te rade? Welk gezag kennen zij hem toe?

De studie geeft antwoord op vragen als: Wordt in het publieke debat zijn invloed uiteindelijk niet overschat? En: Blijft de rol van vrouwelijke religieuze leiders niet te veel buiten beeld door de focus op de imam in de lokale moskee? De indicatieve uitkomsten van de vergelijking tussen het externe en het interne perspectief worden gebruikt om het voortdurende ‘imam debat’ te verhelderen.

Uitgegeven bij Bert Bakker.

Interview NRC Handelsblad door Sheila Kamerman: De imam legt de ‘technische’ regels uit. Continue Reading »

One response so far

Aug 15 2007

Profile Image of

Secularism Confronts Islam - Olivier Roy

Roy’s new book: Secularism Confronts Islam

The denunciation of fundamentalism in France, embodied in the law against the veil and the deportation of imams, has shifted into a systematic attack on all Muslims and Islam. This hostility is rooted in the belief that Islam cannot be integrated into French—and, consequently, secular and liberal-society. However, as Olivier Roy makes clear in this book, Muslim intellectuals have made it possible for Muslims to live concretely in a secularized world while maintaining the identity of a “true believer.” They have formulated a language that recognizes two spaces: that of religion and that of secular society.

Western society is unable to recognize this process, Roy argues, because of a cultural bias that assumes religious practice is embedded within a specific, traditional culture that must be either erased entirely or forced to coexist in a neutral, multicultural space. Instead, Roy shows that new forms of religiosity, such as Islamic fundamentalism and Christian evangelicalism, have come to thrive in post-traditional, secular contexts precisely because they remain detached from any cultural background.

In recognizing this, Roy recasts the debate concerning Islam and democracy. Analyzing the French case in particular, in which the tension between Islam and the conception of Western secularism is exacerbated, Roy makes important distinctions between Arab and non-Arab Muslims, hegemony and tolerance, and the role of the umma and the sharia in Muslim religious life. He pits Muslim religious revivalism against similar movements in the West, such as evangelical Protestantism and Jehovah’s Witnesses, and refutes the myth of a single “Muslim community” by detailing different groups and their inability to overcome their differences.

3 responses so far

Aug 04 2007

Profile Image of

The day I met the ‘respondent’ Kafeel Ahmed « Islam, Muslims, and an Anthropologist

Kafeel Ahmed, an Indian-born aerospace engineer, who the British authorities say drove a burning Jeep Cherokee into a terminal at Glasgow Airport in a botched terrorism attack died Thursday night in a hospital in Scotland, the police said.

The man, 28, sustained severe burns over 90 percent of his body and had remained in critical condition since the failed attack on June 30. The Jeep was loaded with gasoline and burst into flames as it hit the airline terminal.

On Dr. Marranci’s blog a very interesting, personal and sensitive entry about Kafeel Ahmed who was a ‘respondent’ of him in one of researches. A must read:

The day I met the ‘respondent’ Kafeel Ahmed « Islam, Muslims, and an Anthropologist

I still remember his jokes about me being Italian, and the references to the film ‘The Padrino’. Kafeel, the Kafeel who I knew from 2001 to 2003, when I left Belfast, was a very welcoming person, very reserved and shy. Yet when you came to know him better, you discovered his intellectual side, his strong belief in Islam as justice and God’s love. He was a very calm, quite ‘westernised’ Muslim, ever ready to laugh at jokes. Interested in sport, particularly cricket, we spent time speaking at my preferred coffee shop in Botanic Avenue about Muslim identity, the experience of living in Northern Ireland as a Muslim, the tension between India and Pakistan, and the Palestinian Intifada.

No responses yet

Mar 19 2007

Profile Image of

The myth of Muslim support for terror | csmonitor.com

The myth of Muslim support for terror | csmonitor.com

The common enemy is violence and terrorism, not Muslims any more than Christians or Jews an op-ed by By Kenneth Ballen.

WASHINGTON - Those who think that Muslim countries and pro-terrorist attitudes go hand-in-hand might be shocked by new polling research: Americans are more approving of terrorist attacks against civilians than any major Muslim country except for Nigeria.

The survey, conducted in December 2006 by the University of Maryland’s prestigious Program on International Public Attitudes, shows that only 46 percent of Americans think that “bombing and other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians” are “never justified,” while 24 percent believe these attacks are “often or sometimes justified.”

Contrast those numbers with 2006 polling results from the world’s most-populous Muslim countries – Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nigeria. Terror Free Tomorrow, the organization I lead, found that 74 percent of respondents in Indonesia agreed that terrorist attacks are “never justified”; in Pakistan, that figure was 86 percent; in Bangladesh, 81 percent. Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Feb 09 2007

Profile Image of

With Us or Against Us: The Rhetoric of the War on Terror at Yahya Birt

With Us or Against Us: The Rhetoric of the War on Terror at Yahya Birt
With Us or Against Us: The Rhetoric of the War on Terror

This essay offers an analysis of this rhetoric to see what it seeks to persuade Muslims to do, what its unspoken premises are and which categories it uses to mobilise Muslim sentiment. Five years on after 9/11 and with the descent of Iraq into bloody civil war, it is essential that Muslims develop a critical distance from this rhetoric, not only because it can be internalised and have negative consequences for Muslims and how they evaluate themselves and their faith, but also because the rhetoric does much to justify an aggressive militarism that feeds the very terrorism it purports to be ending.

In his essay Birt deconstructs the war on terror discourse in a very sophisticated way. He engages with several issues such as the dichotomy between the west and islam, the so called ‘Muslim anger’ caused by socio-economic disparities and the modern way of life, the weakness of many of the critiques towards the us vs. them advocates, the distinction between good Muslims and bad Muslims and the lack of imagination how to end the war on terror. Well this summary doesn’t really do justice to the essay, so read it yourself.

No responses yet

Dec 17 2006

Profile Image of

Religion in second life

Second Life is one of a growing number of virtual worlds in which you can log on, create a personality, and engage in all kinds of activities from working at an office, to shopping, to having sex and so on. Contrary to many people I have not joined Second Life yet. It would be interesting for anthropoligists to join Second Life and do some virtual research there. Some major questions are for example: Do virtual worlds offer a space of liberation in which people can be ‘authentic,’ then they were before? Is is deep involvement with these virtual worlds an unhealthy addiction that ruins your offline social network? What are the similarities and differences between online and offline social networks? How do the structure and design of virtual worlds affect the societies and cultural mores that emerge in them? What role do identity politics play in the creation and building up of online societies and cultural communities? How is a (cultural) sense of the Self shaped online? How do you learn ‘to be or not to be’ in this virtual world?
One of the main themes that would interest me of course is the creation and expansion of religion and the identity politics of the people concerned. AnarchoAkbar has some very interesting entries on this one and I believe he is preparing a Ph.D research application in order to make Second Life a theme of his research.

In his snapshots he provides several examples of religion in Second life such as a mosque under construction, a Buddhist site (Buddhism seems to have a very prominent presence over there at SL), a synagogue and several churches (Christianity seems dominant). Although not strictly related to religion (mind that it is in many debates) is the question of Darfur and AnarchoAkbar shows that there is room for that too in SL.

Since I’m not at SL, for more questions I should probably refer you to Tom Bukowski (SL avatar):

In this virtual world, my avatar (Tom Bukowski) has an office, “Ethnographia,” which you can visit within Second Life (it is located in Dowden). As Tom Bukowski, I study cybersociality in Second Life using participant observation, interviews, focus groups, and the analysis of texts ranging from newsletters to blogs. A key element of my approach is thus to pair the study of virtual worlds with “traditional” ethnographic methods, paying attention to moments of breakdown when the social relations of the virtual world in question resist ethnographic interpretation as generally understood.

Have fun and interesting times over there!

3 responses so far

Jul 04 2006

Profile Image of

NRC - Illusie van vrije wil ontstaat uit magie

Illusie van vrije wil ontstaat uit magie

Psycholoog Dan Wegner onderzoekt de relatie tussen denken en handelen

Cognitief psycholoog Dan Wegner laat zijn proefpersonen denken dat zij handelingen controleren die ze niet zelf uitvoeren. De onderzoeker, die te werk gaat als een illusionist, concludeert dat de vrije wil een illusie is.

Of je die conclusie (hier natuurlijk wat zwart-wit gesteld) wel zo kunt trekken vraag ik me af, maar niettemin interessant. Biedt ook een interessant licht op mijn post over hyperindividualistische narcisten (bloggers dus); immers indivdualisme  draait  om het centraal stellen van de eigen vrije wil. Continue Reading »

One response so far

Nov 10 2005

Profile Image of

Islam Needs Radicals — In These Times

Islam Needs Radicals — In These Times

By Mark Levine

George W. Bush. Tony Blair. Silvio Berlusconi. Jacques Chirac. Along with most every Western leader, pundit and policymaker, they are frantically searching for the �moderate Muslims� who can save Islam from itself and improve relations with the West.

The problem is that there�s no such thing as a moderate Muslim, at least the way these decision makers define the term. Look at whom they call moderate: President Bush often cites Jordan�s King Abdullah and Morocco�s King Muhammad as the epitome of modern, moderate Muslim leaders. But a glance at the Amnesty International reports on their countries, or those of other so-called moderate regimes, reveals them to be anything but moderate in the way they treat their citizens. In fact, their level of repression and censorship for the most part is equal to or greater than at any time since 9/11.

Searching for �moderate Islam� is an equally problematic enterprise. President Bush famously argued that �Islam means peace� after 9/11 as a way of signaling support for it. But however nice a sentiment, Islam in fact doesn�t mean peace; it means submission to the will of God, which�as anyone familiar with the history of the last two millennia knows�has historically involved quite a lot of war. Similarly, moderate Islam�s boosters point to a hadith, or saying of the Prophet, that argues that the �greater jihad� of self-introspection and improvement is more fundamental for Muslims than the �lesser jihad� of war and violence. In contrast, most conservative Muslim scholars consider �greater jihad� a weak hadith�that is, not the prophet�s actual words. Its use by �moderates� to reform the shari�a�the Islamic code for living that some states institute as law sanctioning violence�has long generated conservative scorn.

In the last two decades, a �moderate� school of Islamist jurisprudence has in fact emerged (known as the wasatiya movement in Arabic). But its leaders have been variously co-opted or censored by their governments, or tend to be quite immoderate when it comes to Jews, homosexuality or full equality for women. The ones that are truly moderate strongly oppose U.S. foreign policy and much of our materialist, consumer culture. For doing so they are labeled �radicals� by their governments, and ours.

Clearly we need to re-imagine our labeling of Islam, because the leaders we consider moderate are�often rightly�considered by their citizens to be corrupt and repressive handmaidens of U.S. policies that themselves could rarely be defined as moderate. On the other hand, Muslims respect those we consider �radicals� for standing up to us, even if most don�t agree with how they�re doing it.

Yet the reality is that even the most radical of extremist groups such as al-Qaeda are not that radical. Instead, they bear striking resemblances to other utopian movements across history, from the Jacobins of post-Revolutionary France to fascists and Maoists of the last century. The tools they use to wage their war�from the Internet to the suicide vest�might be new, but their desire to violently purify their societies is all too familiar.

What would a truly radical Muslim look like? Perhaps like the young Shiite sheikh named Anwar al-Ethari whom I met in Baghdad. He is known as the �Elastic Sheikh� because of his religious and secular university degrees and willingness to use �whatever works, wherever it comes from� to help the residents of his Sadr City neighborhood solve the myriad problems they face. Sadly, I have not heard from him in months, and fear he is among the victims of the increasing violence against the city�s Shiite population.

Or he might look like a friend of mine from Casablanca named Reda Zine. One of the leaders of the Moroccan heavy metal scene, he�s also a soon-to-be Ph.D. in Islamic studies at the Sorbonne. But he and his musical comrades were labeled �satanists� by moderate Islamists and arrested by the moderate Moroccan government because they dared to write powerful�and really loud�songs challenging the country�s patriarchal politics and culture.

Or they might look like Nadia Yassine, the leader of Morocco�s biggest political force, the religiously-oriented Justice and Development movement. In our first meeting she explained that Islam was �hijacked by men� after the Prophet Muhammad�s death and has suffered for it ever since. The next time I saw her she suggested that Morocco might be better off as a republic than a monarchy, a view that landed her in jail, courtesy of the same moderate government that went after the metalheads.

It is she who first suggested to me that what Islam needs is more radicals, not moderates��but radicals in a good sense.� Sitting next to her and nodding in agreement was the Swiss Muslim philosopher Tariq Ramadan. One of the leading progressive voices in Europe, his visa to teach at Notre Dame University was revoked by the U.S. government on the utterly baseless charge of being �tied to terrorists.�

My radical friends and colleagues are routinely oppressed by their governments, attacked by conservatives, obstructed by the United States and ignored by the media and peace groups who should be highlighting their activities and struggles. This suggests they�re doing something right, and that we should be doing more to help them. Of course, that would be pretty radical; but how else to achieve the radical transformation that is necessary to bring peace and democracy to the Middle East, not to mention to America?
Mark LeVine is professor of modern Middle Eastern history, culture and Islamic studies, UC Irvine, and the author of Why They Don�t Hate Us: Lifting the Veil on the Axis of Evil (Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2005)

No responses yet

May 17 2005

Profile Image of

Trouw, religie & filosofie - Cultuurverschil houdt Poolse moslims onderling gescheiden

Trouw, religie & filosofie - Cultuurverschil houdt Poolse moslims onderling gescheiden
Cultuurverschil houdt Poolse moslims onderling gescheiden
door Ekke Overbeek
2005-05-18

Polen heeft een moslim-traditie van 600 jaar. Maar de Tataren hebben moeite met de Arabische nieuwkomers, die naar hun smaak te fanatiek zijn.

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

May 11 2005

Profile Image of

i d e a n t: Open Ijtihad

i d e a n t: Open Ijtihad

[The following presentation was made at the Los Angeles Latino Muslim Association’s annual meeting, April 16 2005.]

Open Ijtihad:
Technology and New Opportunities for Community Building and Activism

ijtihackers

I want to cover four major themes in this presentation. First, I want to say a couple of words about ijtihad, or independent reasoning in Islam. Then, I want to use the concept of open source software to help illustrate the differences between a closed and an open religious system. Third, I want to suggest a methodology for those of us committed to practicing ijtihad in an open system. And finally, I want to suggest ways to use new information and communication technologies to aid in this process. As an example of such applications of technology, I will give a brief introduction to blogs, or web journals.

If we think back to the so-called ‘golden age’ of Islam, we would recognize many characteristics of the kind of ‘open’ system I have summarized here: research, independent reasoning, debate, the forming of networks across spaces and institutions, and even across different religious and cultural affinities. Innovation was encouraged then. Ijtihad was seen as a necessity. But with innovation and ijtihad came responsibility. Let’s embrace that responsibility again, and let’s do our part in ensuring that all of humanity works together towards a more peaceful, just and enlightened existence.

No responses yet

Older Posts »