Newsvine – Ave, Muhammad: a plea for reason in the debate about Islam
This essay, written by Timor & Ramy El-Dardiry, was published on the front page of NRC Handelsblad, a Dutch national newspaper, under the title “‘We invented our own Islam'” [“‘We verzonnen onze eigen islam'”]. The full article in Dutch can be found here and here. They translated it and submitted it to Newsvine: Ave, Muhammad: a plea for reason in the debate about Islam.
Everybody loses in a discussion monopolised by fundamentalists and critics, who all cite exclusively from the Quran to prove that they are right. The average Dutch person perceives a frightening black-and-white version of Islam. Moderate and liberal Muslims become estranged, and retreat from the discussions. Only the terrorist is happy, because he is taken at face value when he claims that he is only carrying out the will of Allah as stipulated in the Quran. Nonetheless, he also freely interprets the Quran: after all, we live in a modern society. If we continue to treat Islam as a colorless monolith, we are giving terrorists free reign.
Both Muslims and concerned Western intellectuals should start to de-sacralize the role of texts in the debate, so that we can arrive at a truly constructive dialogue. It is about time that we recognize and encourage different colors in religion. This also requires a less forced attitude towards religion in public spaces.
Muslims should guard against their religion becoming the victim of a uniforming type of globalization. It is already depressing that we can now eat the same tasteless hamburgers around the world. To sacrifice religion in the same fashion to a fundamentalist movement financed by petrodollars is not only sad, but also dangerous. Muslims, cherish the diversity in your religion! Critics in their turn should point out the differences within Islam to radicals, instead of always stressing the so-called “unbridgeable” differences between Islam and the West.
If God exists, He is probably not waiting for people to criticize or obey Him exclusively on the basis of His very own texts. He created people with a slightly more creative spirit, after all. The texts will always have a different meaning for each individual. That is why we could market our Roman-Islamic faith so successfully. Our religious beliefs may have been curious, but they were just as authentic as those of Muslims in Jakarta, Washington or Amsterdam. They were just as genuine as those of radical, orthodox or liberal Muslims. Not a single text has meaning in a vacuum. If Muslims only experience and defend their religion through its text, they atr lost; if critics only attack religions based on their texts, nothing will change.
Timor El-Dardiry (1983) studied International Economics and International Relations in Maastricht and in Washington, DC respectively. He lives and works in the Dutch city of Maastricht.
Ramy El-Dardiry (1985) is a master student in Applied Physics at the University of Twente, the Netherlands. He completed several months at the Jaringan Liberal Islam in Jakarta as part of his study. He is completing his graduate work in Amsterdam.
As I wrote in the Dutch reaction on this artile, their essay smells like a ‘copy-paste islam’ but one that is neither inherently radical or the result of a-historical bricolage. It’s about the struggle over the definition of what Islam is and should be; a struggle in which people have to negotiate with others, Muslims and non-Muslims, and themselves. The essay clarifies how the social network and developments on a local, national and global level influence those negotiations. Nothing new here, but what makes Islam special is that more then any other religion, it’s a topic of heated public debates. The writers point to an interesting Dutch paradox. While in the Netherlands from the 1990s onwards religion is increasingly seen as a private matter, at the same time Islam has become the topic of public debate, thereby preventing that Islam indeed does become a private issue.
